Tweet
Hello all,
Just curious if anyone has been able to get the "test5.feb" file (in the examples file of the downloaded plugin) to run using the DataMap plugin.
When I attempt to run it I get the following:
"Success loading plugin DataMap.dll (version 0.0.0)
Reading file test5.feb ...FAILED!
FATAL ERROR: Error in data generation (line 1800)"
I thought this might just be a change in the convention for calling the variable ksi in the "surface-to-surface map" element data but after playing with it I still can't get it to run.
My end goal is to use this plugin to vary "E" in the neo-hookean solid mixture of the attached documentG1_2019_07_14_model.feb.
I wanted to run this with an optimization script based on indentation data.
I thought the best way to do this was to make the load curve value (which specifies how the material parameter varies between the two surfaces) be a ratio of the specified input value for "E" in the materials section. My thought process was that the optimization script could change the input value of "E", but the load curve would keep the relative distribution the same throughout the material. Any comments on the practicality of this would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Daniel
Just curious if anyone has been able to get the "test5.feb" file (in the examples file of the downloaded plugin) to run using the DataMap plugin.
When I attempt to run it I get the following:
"Success loading plugin DataMap.dll (version 0.0.0)
Reading file test5.feb ...FAILED!
FATAL ERROR: Error in data generation (line 1800)"
I thought this might just be a change in the convention for calling the variable ksi in the "surface-to-surface map" element data but after playing with it I still can't get it to run.
My end goal is to use this plugin to vary "E" in the neo-hookean solid mixture of the attached documentG1_2019_07_14_model.feb.
I wanted to run this with an optimization script based on indentation data.
I thought the best way to do this was to make the load curve value (which specifies how the material parameter varies between the two surfaces) be a ratio of the specified input value for "E" in the materials section. My thought process was that the optimization script could change the input value of "E", but the load curve would keep the relative distribution the same throughout the material. Any comments on the practicality of this would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Daniel