Different geometry but the same conditions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Joanne Kwon
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 13

    Different geometry but the same conditions

    Two boxes were created - one much bigger than the other.
    I gave both the same conditions like modulus, permeability, load-curve etc.
    However, they gave me two different results - one a viscoelastic curve ('a3' file) and the other a elastic curve ('t55' file).

    I thought they should give me the same results since only the box dimensions were changed.

    Any comments or suggestions for this behaviour?

    Many thanks.

    Regards
    Joanne
  • maas
    Lead Code Developer
    • Nov 2007
    • 3441

    #2
    Hi Joanne,

    I believe the problem might be related to your boundary conditions. You have no free-draining surfaces (zero pressure) set up in your problem. This means that the fluid should not be able to leave the biphasic material. However, the zero-flux boundary condition (which is the default when no zero pressure surfaces are defined) is a so called "natural" boundary condition and therefor not exactly enforced in an FE analysis. The visco-elastic response you observe might be simply a side-effect of this inaccuracy. I would recommend rerunning the problems with at least one free-draining surface defined.

    Cheers,

    Steve.
    Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah
    Scientific Computing and Imaging institute, University of Utah

    Comment

    Working...
    X
    😀
    😂
    🥰
    😘
    🤢
    😎
    😞
    😡
    👍
    👎